A webcam was noticeably aimed at a Rutgers University freshman and his male guest during their intimate episode in a dorm room, the man testified March 2 at the privacy-invasion trial of the student’s roommate.

The man, who has been shrouded in mystery throughout the high-profile case and has been identified only as M.B., appeared in a New Jersey court looking clean-cut and not matching the description of the overweight, “sketchy” or homeless-looking man students have said they saw visiting Tyler Clementi’s room.

“I had just glanced over my shoulder and I noticed there was a webcam that was faced toward the direction of the bed,” the man testified, later noting there was no light indicating it was on. “Just being in a compromising position and seeing a camera lens – it just stuck out to me.”

He had met Clementi, 18, through a social networking site for gay men in August 2010, he said, and he texted repeatedly after their third and final rendezvous. He wanted to see him again, though he didn’t know his last name at the time.

“I didn’t know it until I picked up a newspaper,” he said.

Clementi’s name wasn’t in the paper until about a week later, when it was reported that he had jumped to his death from the George Washington Bridge into the Hudson River.

The man’s testimony came in the trial of Clementi’s roommate, 20-year-old Dharun Ravi, who is charged with bias intimidation, invasion of privacy and other crimes. the India-born Ravi is not charged in Clementi’s death, but it was the suicide that helped bring the case national attention.

M.B. and Clementi chatted online initially, he said, and their first in-person meeting was in Clementi’s dorm room on Sept. 17 – two days before the alleged spying.

The judge did not allow photographs of M.B. to be taken in the courthouse, barred any audio or video of him to be recorded, and said he would be identified in court only by his initials. The man’s lawyer had successfully fought to conceal his identity because he’s considered a victim of an alleged sex crime. Invasion of privacy is classified as a sex crime in New Jersey.

Jurors, though, were given his whole name to make sure none knew him.

The trim man appeared in court in a button-down shirt. His hair was closely cropped, and he didn’t have the goatee that some described him as having.

Because of the secrecy surrounding the man’s identity, there was an unusually large media contingent packed into the Middlesex County Courthouse for what was already a high-profile trial.

After a full day’s testimony – most of it during testy cross-examination by a defense layer – many mysteries remained. The man said he was 32 years old. He disclosed little else on his own. In an apparent oversight, jurors were shown a picture of Clementi’s cellphone, which revealed what appeared to be a nickname the student had entered for him.

His lawyer, Richard Pompelio of the New Jersey Crime Victims’ Law Center, said he doesn’t believe he is married and did not know whether he was out as a gay man.

“He’s a fine young man who came here under horrible circumstances to tell the truth,” Pompelio said outside the courtroom during a break in testimony.

He said M.B. had a fledgling relationship with Clementi and learned about his death from hearing it on the radio.

In court, M.B. himself said he lived about a 20-minute drive from Clementi’s dorm and was starting a new job on Sept. 20, 2010.

He testified that he met Clementi in his dorm room three times. The first was on Sept. 17, when he said Ravi was not expected home until the middle of the night. He said he was careful to leave before Ravi was due back. “I made sure to leave well before 2 a.m. as to not cause any conflict,” he said.

The second was Sept. 19, the date of the alleged spying – and the time he said he noticed the webcam.

He said he and Clementi were naked and had sex that night. People who saw webcam images of his encounter with Clementi have testified that they saw no more than a few seconds of video and that the men were not seen doing anything more graphic than kissing. At one point, some said, their shirts were off, but their pants were on.

The man told jurors there were about five students looking at him as he left the building on Sept. 19.

“Had they been in the street or somewhere other than this building I would have asked them why they were looking at me,” he said. He called their actions “unsettling.”

Ravi’s defense lawyer, Steven Altman, repeatedly asked M.B. whether he wanted to meet Clementi for a movie or a cup of coffee – or go anywhere besides the dorm.

“I preferred just to wait until we could have the privacy of a room, wherever that room might be,” he said.

His home often would not work, he said.

The third time he met Clementi was two days later, when Ravi is charged with attempted invasion of privacy. There’s been testimony that the webcam feed did not work that night. According to court papers filed previously, it was unplugged.

M.B. testified that he heard comments from the courtyard outside the dorm that night that bothered him. But he was not allowed to say what it was.

He testified that he wanted to see Clementi again. “As far as whether I was going to return to that building to see him, I felt a little uneasy about it,” he said.

Ravi faces 15 criminal counts. The most serious is bias intimidation, a hate crime punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

Much of the testimony so far has come from college students. Several said Ravi told them that he’d used a webcam to see what was happening in the room he shared with Clementi on Sept. 19 and that he set up the camera again Sept. 21.

But none said that he had general malice toward gays.

Download a PDF of the current issue of Wisconsin Gazette and join our Facebook community.