When making art is
an act of ‘making do’

FacebookTwitterDiggDeliciousStumbleuponBuzz Up!Google BookmarksRSS Feed
(1 vote, average 5.00 out of 5)
Samuel Williams: Instructions

“Samuel Williams: Instructions” is on display through June 19
at inova/Kenilworth, 2155 N. Prospect.
Hours are Wednesday-Sunday noon-5 p.m. and Thursday until 8 p.m. The work above is from a prior installation. – Photo: Courtesy

British artist Samuel Williams, through e-mail, fax or a phone call, is transmitting daily instructions for the building of sculptures at inova/Kenilworth, 2155 N. Prospect. The show, “Samuel Williams: Instructions,” opened on April 1 with an empty gallery. The first set of instructions arrived via e-mail that day and called for the making of a giant marble run. Here is an excerpt from the instructions:

“Go to a nearby sports shop and buy a dozen squash balls, all of the same type.

Bring them back to the gallery.

Have a cup of tea.

From the storeroom, gather up anything that can be used to make a track for these balls to roll along, including tools, tape and screws.

Start experimenting. Find ways to make tracks, and corners which the ball can go round. Find materials which will make good buffers at points where the ball is likely to fall off. Develop methods for raising the track up off the ground.

Tidy all of this away by 4:30 pm to await further instructions.”

The resulting sculpture reflects the ad-hoc problem solving of the group that made it. A bucket, old plastic piping, ladders and cardboard become a surprisingly clever and functional thing that jigs across the wall and magically rounds a corner, via the artist’s specifications. It’s this “thingification,” as coined by the artist, that makes these daily exercises whimsical, interesting and politically pertinent.

The “make do” milieu of this project has settled over our educational and art institutions like a layer of dust – pervasive, ubiquitous. Shortly after last month’s Madison budget rallies, London staged a protest on March 26, bringing an estimated 300,000 marchers to the city center. Severe cuts to public spending threaten life in Britain as they do in Wisconsin. The daily act of making sculptures out of found materials by volunteer crews via an artist whose host institution can’t afford to fly him to Milwaukee frames the stress of the situation.

Like the Wizard of Oz, this unseen artist, who is completing his master’s degree in sculpture at the Royal Academy of Art in London, concocts his daily assignment then pushes the “send” button to traverse the ocean. Williams feels present within the galleries as his voice and spirit translate into odd contraptions like a shopping cart equipped as a studio/suitcase or a desk drilled with holes.

The project relates to Williams’ broader art practice of self-imposed limitations. “A limitation itself can be just another tool,” he says.

One recent video work called “Sculpture Face” shows people receiving quick transformative gestures that turn them into works of art. He wraps one head in clear tape, drapes another with cloth, attaches cardboard tubes or pieces of toast to another. Within this speedy delivery, Williams chases the elusive moment where a mundane thing or activity takes a turn toward becoming art. His sweetly simple exercises are fraught with defeat.

Williams’ videos, as well as footage from the building of the inova projects, can be seen in the back screening area.

As of this writing, nine sculptures had been built. By the end of the show, there will be 38. Williams’ ideas for projects are varied and often quite challenging. Curator Nicholas Frank seemed to take a deep breath as he checked the e-mail to see if the day’s project had arrived. Indeed it had. Time to get to work. Williams presented the following instructions:

“You have ten minutes to choose four artworks by four different American artists from the early Twentieth Century, working between these dates: 1900 -1925.

We need to cover Impressionism, Ruralism, Realism and Idealism.

Use the rest of the day to do the following:

Film yourself recreating each artwork in twenty seconds.

Aim to do the most faithful reconstruction that you can, rehearse and do multiple takes.

Film outside if you need to.”

Sounds straightforward enough. But what the heck is “Ruralism”? From seemingly simple directives arise many questions. Even the most straightforward and well-considered instructions reveal the limitations of language. The entire back gallery has been turned into a workroom for the production needs of these tasks.

Many of the one-a-day sculptures dip into history. One involved images of sculptures by Sol LeWitt (another master of instruction-based art) that needed to be reproduced with various colors of locally dug dirt turned into mud paint. The various modern movements that utilized lowbrow or castoff materials, decentralized the role of the author, courted chance in denial of predictable outcomes and emphasized performative collaboration all feel close at hand here. Dada, Fluxus and Arte Provera have the same bi-polar, playful yet politically frustrated spirit of Williams’ project.

“What if” is always a generative premise. The inova show is compelling because it keeps asking that question, and, as an audience, we get to see what transpires as a narrow set of orders and time constraints open into nearly endless possibilities. You can follow this project and see all of the daily instructions on a blog, http://instructions.samuel-williams.co.uk/#home. But it’s better to see the show in person.

Comments

0 5 Thomas Gaudynski 2011-04-27 12:06
Upon seeing the exhibit, I can back off from the authoritarian perception based on the particular instruction you posted as an example. It is a consensual relationship between artist and students with the former providing the challenging assignment and the latter following it creatively, just as John Smithie suggests, like a class in art school. If this is exploitation of that “make do” "layer of dust settled over our educational and art institutions," as you suggest, to make performative, collaborative installation art, ok. Teachers and students work with these processes and create similar “performances,” as Joe suggests, everyday. Perhaps the value to the gallery goer is bringing this out of the class room and presenting it in a playful public way. A continuous project altered daily.

It would be interesting for the students to turn the tables and e-mail or fax Mr. Williams some instructions and see what results.

Thanks for suggesting a visit.
Quote Report
0 4 Joseph R. Reeves 2011-04-26 18:17
I have yet to see the show in person, but I find this concept very intriguing. I personally respond to the "dictatorial" elements humorously. I think the arbitrary constraints, lend to the humor, and attribute to a role-reversal of sorts between the artist and curator.
Over all, I can appreciate that it is circumstantial art- socially, economically, etc.- but I think this work speaks to me even more so, on a performative level, and as a curatorial challenge.
With traditional mediums becoming increasingly integrated, I see this piece as a playful comment on the diverse role artists now take. I can't help but love the idea that the curator's job in such a show, makes them subject to the same silly whims and parameters that an artist would be subject to while working with a gallery.
why identical squash-balls? why only ten minutes? because the artist said so. This is dictatorial, but so are the perimeters of a gallery show, that an artist must heed to.
Quote Report
0 3 Debra Brehmer 2011-04-22 16:43
Capitalist, totalitarian? I don't think so. It seems like the opposite. All art operates on economic models whether we know it or not, but this show seems to run on interaction and collaboration and offers a different model of how an art exhibition can develop and inhabit a gallery space. But you guys should really go see it and then post your response. I will wait patiently.
Quote Report
0 2 john smithie 2011-04-22 08:34
:-*
well...“Go to a nearby sports shop and buy a dozen squash balls, all of the same type.

Bring them back to the gallery.

Have a cup of tea.

nice capitalist start, lets go shopping. then get the stuff. nice class viewpoint. why not be real...in New York it would be do a dumpster dive.

is this a 101 art teacher exercise? I have to have a cup of tea and think about this. ta ta!
Quote Report
0 1 Thomas Gaudynski 2011-04-21 18:15
This seems very authoritarian and arbitrary. Almost dictatorial. “You have ten minutes…” Why ten? Why not two weeks? Sol Le Witt, as your example, didn’t have draftsman captive to whim. They knew the instructions before beginning the work. Similarly, it doesn’t sound “open form” like, say John Cage, again where the intention was to make the experience new and exciting to the performer as to the listener. Seems more like reality TV where you will get voted off the island if you don’t satisfy the master’s instructions. Or a design firm where you are working for an arrogant client and “must” do what they say, “the client is always right,” because you want to keep your job or healthcare benefits.

Very unsettling. But perhaps a perfect example of the totalitarian world we increasingly inhabit. I’d choose something else myself.
Quote Report

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.